Chronic Suicidality vs. Acute Crisis

chronic suicidality and acute crisis

When thinking about the experience of “being suicidal,” many people often imagine singular, acute crises. However, this is not the only relationship with suicide that’s relevant for clinical care. While individuals can certainly experience acute crises characterized by singular behaviors or peaks of ideation, others might experience longer-term relationships with these thoughts and behaviors that have been around for weeks, months, or years. Such chronic relationship with suicidal thoughts, feelings, and behaviors can make suicide like a “new normal”; we’ve had many clients tell us thinking about suicide is “just what [they’ve] learned to do” when stressed or overwhelmed. It can be helpful for providers to be able to compare and contrast these experiences, and consider implications for clinical practice.

What Is Chronic Suicidality vs. Acute Crisis? 

Acute Crisis

Acute crises are characterized by sudden and intense escalations of suicidal thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. These can be triggered by many kinds of internal or external “activating events,” including psychosocial stressors, unexpected news, or something drastically changing a person’s mental state.

When someone is triggered in this way, they very commonly find it difficult to rely on their problem solving capacities/rational thinking as usual. Instead, many people find their thoughts “constricted” or narrowed (like “tunnel vision”). These challenges are often also accompanied by characteristic changes in physiological sensations (like fight/flight activation), emotions, and behavioral responses that can peak within minutes, even if their impact can last for much longer. 

Such crises are often very scary for the individual, their loved ones, and clinicians working with them. Individuals in this state require immediate support, which could include calling a suicide hotline, engaging with a trained mental health provider, or visiting an emergency department. These contacts typically first center around understanding or assessing the context/narrative of the crisis and how to effectively respond in the moment. The more effectively we can gather this data, the more effectively we can plan crisis response strategies to mitigate current activating events and prevent a future crisis. With “safety and stability” thus addressed and monitored, we can then move forward with broader treatment for remaining pain that makes life not feel worth living. 

Chronic Suicidality

Chronic suicidality refers to persistent and recurring suicidal thoughts. These recurring thoughts might happen over months or even years. Chronic suicidality can be caused by a number of factors, such as a history of trauma, ongoing stressors, long-term mental health conditions such as borderline personality disorder. [1] It may also be caused by a combination of these factors. 

For those who experience chronic suicidality, their feelings toward suicide typically fluctuate. Some feelings may be more intense at times and less intense at others. These suicidal feelings often coexist with the person’s daily life and functioning to the point where they start to feel normal. While the immediate risk of suicide may be lower for a majority of the time, those who are struggling will likely face episodes of high risk. For some, it may happen often, while for others, these episodes may be further apart. Long-term therapeutic approaches are needed for people experiencing chronic suicidality. 

How Chronic and Acute Suicidality Overlap

Chronic suicidality and acute crisis can go hand in hand. Chronic suicidality may escalate into an acute crisis, and an acute crisis may eventually lead to chronic suicidality if a person is experiencing these crises over and over again. It’s important to remember that the words “chronic” and “acute” do not mean these issues are small or should be taken lightly. Both chronic and acute suicidality need to be treated seriously. 

Why Do Some People Stay Stuck? 

Chronic suicide specifically becomes a major problem for people who are returning to a state of crisis time and time again. Often, they are re-visiting emergency departments where they are stabilized. However, treatment is limited and finding a path to healing can be tricky when a person doesn’t have a clear plan for moving forward.

When someone is struggling with chronic suicide, it usually signals that there is a need under the surface that is not being met. For some people, chronic suicidal ideation is tied to a person’s identity. Thoughts of suicide may be comforting to these people, giving them a “way out” of whatever difficulties they are facing in their life. For others, it provides a way of making them feel connected to others or like they become more of a priority. Whatever the feeling it’s bringing up or the need it’s serving, it’s important to get to the bottom of what suicide is providing and what is a more appropriate way to meet this need. [2]

How CAMS Offers Hope

With both chronic and acute suicide, a person’s narrative is important. How are they seeing themselves, and where is suicide fitting into their story? For example, maybe their narrative is that they’re a burden to others, and over time, this has manifested. Maybe it’s that they don’t really matter to others unless they are in a life-or-death situation. This is why changing the narrative can be a helpful way of approaching someone’s root cause when it comes to suicidal ideation

CAMS offers a new way of helping a person see how they fit into their own life story. Discovering how to cultivate a life worth living is one of the most important parts of healing, and this is a core component of CAMS. By focusing on what a person values, enjoys, and what truly matters to them, they can start to shift their thinking from thoughts of suicide to reasons to stay alive and live their life to the fullest. 

Everyone’s Story Matters

Both acute crisis and chronic suicidality need to be taken seriously. For those struggling with ongoing tendencies toward suicidal ideation, further help is often needed to address the root cause of why this struggle is persistent. With the right types of treatment and care, people can find hope and start to more fully experience a life full of meaning and purpose.

 

[1] Nih.gov

[2] Nih.gov

 

FAQ(Frequently Asked Questions)

Can someone have chronic suicidal thoughts and still function day to day?

Yes, for many individuals, persistent suicidal thoughts can coexist with daily functioning to the point where they begin to feel like a “new normal.” Feelings may fluctuate in intensity over weeks, months, or even years, while the person continues working, maintaining relationships, and managing everyday responsibilities. This does not mean risk is absent; people experiencing chronic suicidality are likely to encounter episodes of heightened risk over time and benefit from long-term therapeutic support.

Can chronic suicidality become an acute crisis?

Chronic suicidality and acute crisis can overlap and influence one another. Persistent suicidal thoughts can escalate into an acute crisis when a significant activating event such as a major psychosocial stressor or unexpected life change intensifies ideation rapidly. Clinicians should treat both presentations with equal seriousness, as neither label implies the risk is minor.

What warning signs suggest suicidal thoughts are becoming more urgent?

A shift from chronic to acute suicidal crisis is often marked by a sudden and intense escalation of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that feel qualitatively different from a person’s baseline. Individuals may show signs of constricted or “tunnel vision” thinking, difficulty accessing their usual problem-solving capacity, heightened physiological arousal such as fight-or-flight activation, and behavioral changes that can develop within minutes. When these signs are present, immediate support such as contact with a trained mental health provider or crisis services is warranted.

Why do some people feel “stuck” in chronic suicidality?

People who experience recurring suicidal crises often cycle through stabilization without addressing the underlying factors driving the pattern. Chronic suicidal ideation frequently signals an unmet need: for some individuals, thoughts of suicide are tied to their identity or provide a perceived way out of pain, while for others they function as a means of feeling connected to or prioritized by others. Lasting progress typically requires identifying what the suicidal thoughts are providing and finding more appropriate ways to meet those needs. Learn more about how the CAMS Framework® approaches this work at https://cams-care.com.

How should clinicians respond to chronic suicidal ideation?

Chronic suicidality requires long-term therapeutic approaches rather than crisis stabilization alone. A key clinical task is understanding a person’s narrative, including how they see themselves and where suicide fits into their story, in order to address root causes rather than only immediate risk. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) is a therapeutic framework that centers this work, helping clinicians and patients collaboratively explore what is driving suicidal ideation and build toward a life worth living. Learn more about the CAMS Framework® at https://cams-care.com.

What causes chronic suicidality?

Chronic suicidality can result from a range of factors, including a history of trauma, ongoing psychosocial stressors, and long-term mental health conditions such as borderline personality disorder. It may also develop from a combination of these factors interacting over time. Because the causes are often complex and interconnected, effective treatment typically requires sustained, individualized clinical care rather than a single intervention.

Zero Suicide: What about “Treat”?

Date: May 3, 2024

In this Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention editorial, Julie Goldstein Grumet and David Jobes argue that while the Zero Suicide framework has driven meaningful reductions in suicide deaths, its “Treat” component — the use of evidence-based, suicide-specific treatments like DBT, CBT, and CAMS — remains inconsistently implemented across healthcare systems. The authors outline barriers to adoption (training gaps, malpractice fears, reimbursement structures) and offer six recommendations to close this evidence-to-practice gap, including expanded clinician training, reimbursement reform, and updated accreditation standards.

Authors: Julie Goldstein Grumet, Ph.D. and David A. Jobes, Ph.D. 

About the Author

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Novel Telehealth Adaptations for Evidence-Based Outpatient Suicide Treatment: Feasibility and Effectiveness of the Crisis Care Program

Date: December 13, 2023

This Healthcare study evaluates Crisis Care, a telehealth-adapted version of the CAMS Framework®, delivered to 130 outpatient patients over 16 weeks. Findings show fast access to care and reductions in depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation across all patient groups, supporting telehealth CAMS as a scalable option for treating suicide risk in outpatient settings.

Authors: J. Conor O’Neill, Erin T. O’Callaghan, Scott Sullivan and Mirène Winsbe

An observational pilot of the collaborative assessment and management of suicidality brief intervention (CAMS-BI) for adult inpatients

Can a single 60-minute session make a meaningful difference for inpatients experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors? Inpatient psychiatric care for this population remains highly variable, and patient-centered behavioral interventions are often absent at the level one setting. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality Brief Intervention (CAMS-BI) was designed to address this gap.

Suicide Prevention in K-12 Schools: Introduction to the Special Issue

Date: April 27, 2026

School-based mental health partnerships are vital for youth suicide prevention, especially in rural areas with limited access. Evidence shows asking about suicide does not increase risk and aids early intervention. Developing comprehensive, multi-tiered approaches, including tertiary supports like CAMS, and strengthening collaborations among schools, researchers, and communities are essential for scalable, effective prevention.

 

About the Authors

Amy Brausch Ph.D.

Amy Brausch Ph.D.
Dr. Amy Brausch is an Associate Professor of Psychological Sciences at Western Kentucky University where she founded the Risk Behaviors and Suicide Prevention Laboratory in 2011. She completed her Ph.D. in clinical psychology at Northern Illinois University in 2008, following her clinical internship at Utah State University Counseling and Psychological Services Center. Dr. Brausch’s research program broadly focuses on youth suicide risk assessment, prevention, and treatment. Specifically, her work has also focused on the overlap between nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide risk, the overlap between body image, disordered eating, and self-harm, and the role of emotion dysregulation in NSSI and suicide risk. Her work has been funded by the Kentucky Biomedical Research Infrastructure Network and the National Institute of Mental Health. Dr. Brausch has collaborated with Dr. Jobes on research related to CAMS-4Teens, including a validation study of the Suicide Status Form for adolescents. As a Senior Consultant with CAMS-care, LLC, Dr. Brausch has provided training in CAMS to mental health providers in the United States and Australia at community mental health centers, university counseling centers, school districts, and local and state mental health suicide prevention organizations.

Kurt D. Michael, Ph.D.

Kurt D. Michael, Ph.D.
Kurt D. Michael, Ph.D. is Senior Clinical Director at the Jed Foundation and former Stanley R. Aeschleman Distinguished Professor of Psychology at Appalachian State University, where he spent 23 years building a nationally recognized program in rural school mental health and adolescent suicidology. Born and raised in Denver, Colorado, he earned his BA from the University of Colorado at Boulder, followed by his MS and PhD in Clinical-School Psychology from Utah State University, and completed his internship in Child Clinical Psychology at Duke University Medical Center. Dr. Michael founded the Assessment, Support, and Counseling (ASC) Centers — embedded school mental health partnerships serving rural K–12 communities in Appalachia — which annually reach 10–30% of enrolled students with services including crisis assessment, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and psychoeducational groups. He has been a leading voice in suicide prevention, lethal means counseling (CALM), and the implementation of CAMS with youth, and developed the Prevention of Escalating Adolescent Crisis Events (PEACE) Protocol, which has been adapted for use in rural and tribal communities across the country. His prolific research spans meta-analysis, crisis intervention, and rural mental health, including a landmark network meta-analysis on antidepressant efficacy in youth published in The Lancet. He is also co-editor of the Handbook of Rural School Mental Health and serves as Associate Editor of the Journal of Rural Mental Health. His work has been recognized with the Governor's UNC Board of Governors Award for Excellence in Public Service, among other honors.

The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality vs. Treatment as Usual: A Retrospective Study with Suicidal Outpatients

This retrospective study compared CAMS — a collaborative, structured approach to suicide risk assessment — against standard care in 55 military outpatients. CAMS patients resolved suicidality faster (~7 sessions vs. ~11 for TAU) and used significantly less non-mental health medical care afterward. No differences were found in hospitalization or suicide attempt rates. The authors conclude CAMS shows early promise but call for larger, randomized studies to confirm results.

Authors: David A. Jobes, PhD, Steven A. Wong, PhD, Amy K. Conrad, MA, John F. Drozd, PhD, and Tracy Neal-Walden, PhD

About the Author

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality in the Aftercare Focus Study: Costs, Benefits, Cost-Effectiveness, and Cost-Benefits

This dissertation by Phoebe McCutchan examines whether the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) — a suicide-focused therapy — offers economic advantages over standard care for recently discharged psychiatric patients. Using data from a randomized controlled trial, the study finds that CAMS was less costly, comparably or more effective at reducing suicidal ideation, and more cost-effective and cost-beneficial than standard care, suggesting it delivers better value in resource-constrained healthcare settings.

 

The Suicide Status Form-4 (SSF-IV) as a Potentially Therapeutic Suicide Risk Assessment Tool

Date: March 22, 2024

The first direct empirical test of a long-standing claim: that the SSF — the core assessment instrument within CAMS — is not just a risk assessment tool but a therapeutic intervention in its own right. Working with 57 high-risk patients on an inpatient psychiatric consultation-liaison service at a Level 1 trauma center, the authors used CAMS-Brief Intervention (CAMS-BI) and tracked subjective distress (SUDS) across five time points within each session. Pre-to-post-session distress dropped significantly across patients, with a trend favoring Section A of the SSF.

Authors: Nicolas Oakey-Frost, Emma H. Moscardini, Tovah Cowan, Jessica L. Gerner, Kathleen A. Crapanzano, David A. Jobes, and Raymond P. Tucker.

About the Author

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

A Developmentally Informed Approach to the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicide (CAMS) for Adolescents (CAMS-4Teens™) and Engaging Parents in Treatment

Date: September 22, 2022

The developmental adaptation of CAMS for adolescents introduces the CAMS Parent Report Form (CAMS PRF), a clinical tool designed to bring parents into suicide-specific treatment in a structured but flexible way. This paper offers practical guidance for clinicians on assessing parent strengths and needs, integrating parent perspectives without compromising the youth’s collaborative relationship with the therapist, and using the PRF to inform treatment and discharge planning.

Authors: Jennifer B. Blossom, Abby Ridge-Anderson, Molly C. Adrian, and David A. Jobes.

About the Author

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Advancing Suicide Intervention Strategies for Teens (ASSIST): Study Protocol for a Multisite Randomised Controlled Trial

Date: December 12, 2023

ASSIST is the protocol for a three-arm RCT comparing the Safety Planning Intervention with structured follow-up (SPI+), the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS), and enhanced usual care for adolescents transitioning from acute to outpatient care after a suicidal crisis. Conducted across two pediatric hospitals, it will help build the evidence base for brief, scalable, suicide-specific interventions for youth.

Authors: Molly Adrian, Elizabeth McCauley, Robert Gallop, Jack Stevens, David A Jobes, Jennifer Crumlish, Barbara Stanley, Gregory K Brown, Kelly L Green,  Jennifer L Hughes, Jeffrey A Bridge

About the Author

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.