The Role of Family Estrangement in Suicidal Ideation: Understanding the Connection and Finding Hope

Family is a central part of most people’s lives, but when family relationships are strained, it can bring immense pain and grief. Lack of family support can play a huge role in many aspects of a person’s life, including their mental health. 

The topic of family estrangement has historically been understudied and under researched. Because all scenarios are unique, it’s difficult to compare different people’s experiences. Family estrangement, however, is surprisingly common, and it’s important to be aware of the ways it can affect you or someone you know.

Understanding Estrangement

Estrangement is defined as no longer being on friendly terms with a person or group of people – usually someone you were previously close with. According to some studies, as many as one in four people are estranged from at least one family member. 1 Causes of family estrangement vary greatly depending on the situation and people involved. However, there are some common factors that often play a role. 

  • Unresolved issues: When families have issues that have been swept under the rug for years, this can cause a deep rift. Examples are significant life changes that occurred in the family (such as divorce) or persistent emotional issues (such as pressure or favoritism) that were never addressed.
  • Generational trauma: Trauma can sometimes be passed down from one generation to the next. This creates a cycle that is hard to break.
  • Differences in lifestyle or beliefs: People change as they grow. These changes can lead to different views or beliefs. Other family members may feel threatened or uncomfortable with these differences. This can cause conflict in relationships.
  • Addiction or abuse: In some extreme situations, such as addiction or abuse, estrangement may be necessary for the safety of you and others.


Estrangement and Suicidal Ideation: The Connection


Family estrangement results in many
complicated feelings. It’s no surprise that it has a negative impact on a person’s life, contributing to higher levels of depression. 2  Suicidal ideation can result from these depressed feelings combined with other emotions and struggles that build up over time. 

Isolation and rejection are two common feelings people facing family estrangement may experience. Being left without the support of someone you’ve grown up with can be a challenging shift. It also makes joyful seasons, like holidays or family celebrations, become complicated, painful, and lonely for those left out.

Guilt is another challenging feeling. In some situations, the person who has been estranged is left wondering if they could have prevented the situation. They may be blamed by family members for causing the problem in the first place. 

If someone needs to distance themselves from a family member for safety, they might feel guilty. They may struggle with not being able to help that person. These feelings can be tough when you have a family member with a serious addiction. It is hard when they refuse to get help.


Additional Risk Factors

Family estrangement can cause strong negative feelings. However, it’s also important to think about other risk factors. These factors may be present when someone is having thoughts of suicide.

People with a history of mental health issues are at higher risk. This also includes those who feel socially isolated.

Having a history of unhealthy coping methods, like using drugs and alcohol, can also lead to thoughts of suicide. Community and social factors can also play a role. For example, there may be a stigma around seeking help. People might also have limited access to mental health resources. 3


Support Beyond Family

When someone is dealing with family estrangement, it’s important for them to find outlets for support, whether it be friends or support groups in their community. Having people to turn to during both tough times and joyous moments is essential to maintaining mental well-being and fostering a sense of motivation and purpose. 

Therapy is also crucial when dealing with family estrangement. A therapist can help you untangle the layers of complicated and conflicting emotions you may be experiencing as well as help you learn healthy coping skills.


Moving Forward 

Not every instance of family estrangement is permanent. Sometimes, it can be possible to find reconciliation and healing. This usually happens gradually through small steps of communication with clear boundaries from both parties. Working with a family therapist can be helpful when mending these relationships. 

However, not every scenario benefits from finding a resolution. There are times when estrangement is permanent, whether by your choice or someone else’s. In these instances, speaking with a therapist can be helpful in learning to grieve, accept the situation, and move forward.

Family estrangement is incredibly complex and can leave lasting impacts. When estrangement leads to suicidal ideation, it’s crucial to seek help or recognize the warning signs in others who are struggling. Healing and recovery are possible through avenues such as therapy and support groups. If you or someone you know is struggling, reach out to the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline

Public Health Approaches to Suicide Prevention

Because of our rising suicide rate, the United States Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, called mental health the “defining health crisis of our time.” Despite many countries having had suicide prevention strategies for decades, we see a general lack of investment with suicide rates increasing in many settings and suicide-related inequities. The majority of people who die by suicide were not engaged in mental health services in the months before their deaths. This indicates the need to also advance a public health approach to suicide rather than primarily relying on the crisis and mental health systems for suicide prevention. Suicide prevention approaches must be engaging, culturally relevant and meet people where they are by spanning multiple community service sectors (e.g., schools, colleges/universities, healthcare, justice system, child welfare, etc.) and social media. The epidemiology of suicide, risk factors for suicide, the national context, and suicide research evidence are shifting which could point to possible new directions for suicide prevention.

Holly Wilcox, PhD

About Holly Wilcox Ph.D.

Dr. Holly Wilcox is founder and Director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Suicide Prevention. She is also a Professor in the Department of Mental Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health with joint appointments in the Department of Health Policy and Management as well as the schools of medicine and education.  Holly uses research to advance public health approaches to suicide prevention, including policies, early intervention, and chain of care approaches. Holly serves as President of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), on the national board of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), and as a consultant on suicide prevention for the WHO.

 

David A. Jobes, PhD

About David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter your information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

New Directions in Suicide Safety Planning: The Project Life Force (PLF) Intervention

Dr. Goodman describes the development and testing of a novel treatment – “Project Life Force (PLF)” – which combines aspects of two evidence based treatments: Suicide Safety Planning and Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills. The intervention is delivered in a group format and virtually since the pandemic. PLF framework, clinical data and implementation efforts were reviewed.

Marianne Goodman, PhD

Marianne Goodman, MD

Dr. Goodman has been a full time VA clinician (psychiatrist)-scientist at the James J. Peters VA Medical Center (JJPVA) for twenty-five years. In addition to being the Director of the VISN 2 Mental Illness, Research, Education, Clinical Center (MIRECC), she was the Director and developer of the JJPVA Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) Clinical and Research program from 2002-2015 and Director of the JJPVA Suicide Prevention Clinical Research Program from 2015-present. Her expertise is in the management of high risk suicidal and emotionally dysregulated Veterans and is considered one of the top suicide prevention experts in the VA system, actively involved in clinical care, research and education. Additionally, she has been the recipient of several prestigious awards for her involvement in suicide prevention and DBT treatment including the New York Federal Executive Employee Outstanding Individual Achievement Award for her Clinical DBT Program for Suicidal Veterans (2009), VISN 3 Network Director’s Achievement Award for Training VISN 3 Clinicians in DBT (2012), and the New York State Excellence in Suicide Prevention Award for Implementation of Zero Suicide in a Healthcare Setting (2018).
In 2015, she shifted her research direction to focus on treatment development for suicide prevention and designed “Project Life Force” (PLF) a novel group intervention that adapts DBT, combining emotion regulation skills with suicide safety planning and lethal means safety which was initially funded with a VA RR&D SPiRE pilot grant (2016-2018), and more recently funded with a multi-site VA RCT with a CSRD Merit (2018-2024). This intervention has moved to full telehealth delivery and with a 2021 SPRINT pilot award expanded to target populations of suicidal rural Veterans (PLF-RV). Dr. Goodman will present on her Project Life Force Intervention.

David A. Jobes, PhD

About David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter your information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Colorado’s Comprehensive Approach to Suicide Prevention: What’s Working

Colorado's Comprehensive Approach to Suicide Prevention: What's Working

Dr. Lena Heilmann, Director of the Colorado Office of Suicide Prevention (OSP), provided an overview of Colorado’s comprehensive approach to suicide prevention, including the programs OSP funds and leads; Colorado-specific suicide-related data and data systems; a deeper dive into the Colorado-National Collaborative and OSP’s emphasis on suicide-specific care; how OSP works to meet the needs of all Colorado communities, including priority populations that face unique challenges and barriers that can increase risk of suicide; how OSP funds its programs through braided fundings and federal grants; the Colorado Suicide Prevention Commission and collaborations with partners across the state through its five active workgroups covering the programs we run and fund through OSP; what a comprehensive approach is; what the CNC is; that we work to meet the needs of all Colorado communities, including priority populations; which federal grants we have and how we implement them; provide an overview of the Commission and workgroups; and show some Colorado-specific data.

Lena Heilmann, PhD

About Lena Heilmann, PhD

Lena Heilmann (she/hers), PhD, MNM, is the Director of the Colorado Office of Suicide Prevention (which is housed within CDPHE). The Office of Suicide Prevention’s mission is to serve as the lead entity for suicide prevention, intervention supports, and postvention efforts in Colorado, collaborating with communities statewide to reduce the number of suicide deaths and attempts. Lena leads a team of eleven people who are passionate about reducing the impact of suicide in Colorado. Lena leads suicide prevention responses to media inquiries, provides subject matter expertise to legislation, serves as the Co-Chair for the Suicide Prevention Commission, is accountable to meeting statutory mandates for the Office, and serves as PI on two SAMHSA grants: GLS Youth Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention and the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention. Lena is fiercely committed to equity in the Office’s approach to comprehensive suicide prevention and had led various initiatives to center community voice, lived experience, and to address disparities impacting Coloradans.

Lena’s passion for this work comes directly from her lived experience. In 2012, Lena lost her only sister Danielle to suicide. Lena’s world and identity shattered with the loss of her soulmate sister. In order to survive this traumatic grief and to honor her sister, Lena decided to leave her career as a German and Gender/Women’s Studies professor and turned to a life of suicide prevention. She connected with sibling suicide loss survivors and compiled a book-length collection of essays titled Still With Us: Voices of Sibling Suicide Loss Survivors, which the American Association of Suicidology (AAS) recognized by awarding Lena with the 2021 AAS Suicide Loss Survivor of the Year Award. Lena volunteers for the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP)’s Healing Conversations program.

David A. Jobes, PhD

About David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter your information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

2024 CAMS Update and Introducing CAMS Brief Intervention

2024 CAMS Update and Introducing CAMS Brief Intervention

In this suicide prevention month webinar, Dr. Jobes will discuss recent updates based on clinical trial research, clinical use of CAMS, and training developments related to CAMS. With five on-going randomized controlled trials and a series of recent publications, there is much news to report on all things CAMS. Dr. Jobes will then be joined by Dr. Ray Tucker who will present on the emerging use of CAMS as a single-session brief inpatient and/or emergency department intervention with promising preliminary evidence. There are now several new research efforts to replicate and extend early CAMS-BI™ findings. Join us for this exciting update and introduction to CAMS BI as a novel and much needed suicide-focused brief intervention.

David A. Jobes, PhD

About David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Dr Raymond Tucker Headshot

About Dr. Raymond P. Tucker

Associate Professor of Psychology, Louisiana State University (LSU)
Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC)/Our Lady of the Lake (OLOL),
Raymond P. Tucker is a licensed clinical psychologist and associate professor of psychology at Louisiana State University. There he teaches undergraduate courses in psychology, graduate courses in clinical psychology, and founded the LSU Mitigation of Suicidal Behavior research laboratory. As a clinical assistant professor of psychology at LSUHSC/OLOL, he trains medical staff/students in suicide-specific evidence-based assessment and intervention protocols.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter you information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Suicide Prevention: Why Are Therapists Rarely Trained in Suicide Prevention & Treatment?

Date: February 21, 2023

Rates for death by suicide are on the rise and sadly, those we turn to for help have little to no formal training to effectively treat suicidal patients. The current state of suicide prevention is well illustrated in the image below.

Suicide Prevention Training
Teresa Lo/USA Today

 

USA Today recently published two articles that explore the challenges of training mental health professionals in preventing suicide and tips for suicidal people on how to find a qualified mental health professional.  CAMS is one of only a few evidence and outcome-based treatments noted by the Joint Commission and included in both the Zero Suicide Toolkit and the CDC’s Preventing Suicide: A Technical Package of Policy, Programs and Practices.

Explore USA Today Articles on the Relationship Between Therapy & Suicide Prevention

Learn more about the challenges faced by both therapists and patients when it comes to managing & preventing suicidal ideation. Read the articles below to find out more.

We Tell Suicidal People to Go to Therapy. So Why Are Therapists Rarely Trained in Suicide?

Get the expert perspective on the importance of suicide prevention training and how it can be improved in the mental health field. Learn more about challenges that therapists face in identifying and treating patients with suicidal thoughts, including the stigma surrounding suicide and the lack of standardized suicide prevention training in graduate programs for mental health professionals. Read the article

How To Find a Therapist if You’re Suicidal

Find out about the importance of seeking professional help for those struggling with suicidal thoughts, and get practical advice on how to find a therapist who can provide effective, evidence-based support for suicidal ideation. Read the article

The CAMS Framework® of Suicide Assessment: Intervention, Prevention & Treatment Backed By 30 Years of Ongoing Clinical Research

CAMS-care (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) offers several courses to mental health professionals to help them provide effective care to individuals with suicidal ideation.

Managing Suicidal Risk: A Collaborative Approach

The current edition of Dr. Jobes’ book, “Managing Suicidal Risk: A Collaborative Approach,” introduces the CAMS Framework for suicide prevention and therapy. The CAMS Framework is backed by decades of extensive research and emphasizes a collaborative approach to managing suicidal risk. The book provides evidence-based data and practical guidance on how to implement CAMS in clinical settings, making it an essential resource for mental health professionals seeking to provide effective care to individuals with suicidal ideation.

Suicide Prevention Video Training

CAMS-care provides video training opportunities for mental health professionals to effectively address malpractice and ethical liability issues when working with suicidal patients. The training covers essential topics, including how to deal with difficult patients and treating suicidal risk in children and adolescents. By providing comprehensive suicide prevention and therapy training, CAMS-care aims to equip mental health professionals with the skills and knowledge they need to provide effective care to individuals with suicidal ideation while minimizing malpractice and ethical liability risks.

Other Evidence-Based Suicide Prevention Training

CAMS consultants offer a range of suicide prevention and therapy training opportunities for mental health professionals. Their on-site Role-Play Training enables clinicians to practice using the CAMS approach with patients, while Education Days provide a broader audience with an understanding of the importance of evidence-based treatments in a system of care. Additionally, CAMS consultants offer Consultation Calls, which provide clinicians with the opportunity to ask questions and receive expert guidance when working with patients who have suicidal ideation. By offering these comprehensive training and consultation services, CAMS aims to equip mental health professionals with the skills and support they need to provide effective care to patients at risk of suicide.

About the Author

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

About David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP

David A. Jobes Ph.D. ABPP
David Jobes, PhD, ABPP, is the founder of CAMS-care, LLC. He began his career in 1987 in the Counseling Center of the Catholic University of America, where he developed a suicide risk assessment tool for college students that evolved into CAMS. Dr. Jobes is now a Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of Clinical Training at Catholic; he has trained thousands of mental health professionals in the United States and abroad in evidence-based assessment and treatment of suicide risk and the use of CAMS.

Strengths-Based Approaches to Suicide Prevention in the Black Community

Strengths-Based Approaches to Suicide Prevention in the Black Community Webinar

The crisis of suicide among Black youth and emerging adults has escalated in recent years. Despite this, little is known about what factors can protect against the occurrence of suicide for Black Americans. In this talk, Dr. Brooks Stephens will review socio-cultural risk factors for suicide among Black youth and emerging adults, share her research focusing on strengths-based approaches to suicide prevention, and outline essential actions needed to address this public health crisis.

Jasmin Brooks Stephens, PhD

Jasmin Brooks Stephens, PhD

Dr. Jasmin Brooks Stephens is an incoming Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Berkeley (starting July 2025). Dr. Brooks Stephens earned her PhD in Clinical Psychology at the University of Houston and completed her clinical internship at Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr. Brooks Stephens’ research focuses on utilizing qualitative and quantitative clinical science methods to characterize the unique social and contextual risk factors that shape the mental health trajectories of Black youth and emerging adults, with a focus on suicide vulnerability and racial trauma. Grounded in strengths-based approaches, her work also aims to identify cultural protective factors that promote resilience and positive psychological well-being for diverse Black communities. Through her work, she aims to develop and implement culturally relevant interventions, programming, and policies that target the reduction of racism-related stress, suicide, and health disparities within Black communities. Her work has been supported by several national organizations including the NASEM Ford Foundation, APA Minority Fellowship Program, and P.E.O. Foundation.

Dr Raymond Tucker Headshot

About Dr. Raymond P. Tucker

Associate Professor of Psychology, Louisiana State University (LSU)
Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC)/Our Lady of the Lake (OLOL),
Raymond P. Tucker is a licensed clinical psychologist and associate professor of psychology at Louisiana State University. There he teaches undergraduate courses in psychology, graduate courses in clinical psychology, and founded the LSU Mitigation of Suicidal Behavior research laboratory. As a clinical assistant professor of psychology at LSUHSC/OLOL, he trains medical staff/students in suicide-specific evidence-based assessment and intervention protocols.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter you information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Jumping in the Hole

This guy’s walking down a street when he falls in a hole. The walls are so steep he can’t get out. A doctor passes by, and the guy shouts up, “Hey you, can you help me out?” The doctor writes a prescription, throws it down in the hole and moves on. Then a priest comes along, and the guy shouts up, “Father, I’m down in this hole, can you help me out?” The priest writes out a prayer, throws it down in the hole and moves on. Then a friend walks by. “Hey Joe, it’s me, can you help me out?” And the friend jumps in the hole. Our guy says, “Are you stupid? Now we’re both down here.” The friend says, “Yeah, but I’ve been down here before, and I know the way out.” 

“Noel” (2000) The West Wing, Season 2, Episode 10

 

I suffered for years with constant thoughts of ending my life, eventually coming to find comfort in them, like a blanket that would keep me warm on cold winter nights.  On the few occasions that I would share this with people, I was either dismissed outright or met with hostility, fear, or was shamed.  While it was painful and difficult for me to understand these responses, as if my verbalization of these thoughts could infect the other person, I have never been able to understand why I was met with these same responses from the mental health professionals who were supposed to be helping me.

By my sophomore year in college, I had taken definitive action to end my life three times.  Although I had been in therapy at the time of each attempt, I never told anybody.  There had already been power struggles about thoughts of ending my life, having been dismissed by one therapist and threatened with hospitalization by another; sharing about actual attempts was off the table.  At age 19, l was starting with a new therapist.  I was suicidal, self-destructive, and distrustful–my prior experiences had taught me to keep secrets.  I do not have memories of our first few sessions, but at some point early on my new therapist asked what I thought my life would be like when I was 25 and I answered honestly, saying “I don’t plan to live that long.”

Instead of being dismissive, moralizing or threatening he was empathetic, compassionate and genuinely interested in what I had to say about my own experience; I was in unfamiliar territory.  Over the next six months, I slowly learned how to trust another person and he tried everything to help me.  We started an interactive journal, each writing in a notebook and passing them back and forth at each meeting to have something between our sessions.  On a beautiful spring day following an especially difficult session, we spent an hour talking and walking around a DC neighborhood instead of sitting in the office.  I remember a particularly painful session where we both sat on the floor and I just cried, remarking that I hated crying in public and him responding with, “I don’t consider myself public.”  I did not realize it at the time, but somewhere along the way, he had jumped down into the hole with me and was desperately trying to help me find my way out.

Seven months after we started working together, on a Tuesday evening, I experienced an acute suicidal crisis.  The thoughts that had always been comforting were terrifying; I was incredibly agitated, self-destructive, and very determined.  Nothing good was going to come out of that night but instead of doing the same thing I had done on three previous occasions, I picked up the phone.  Despite our collective best effort to keep me out of the hospital, that is where I ended up–but I was alive and it was because of the strength of the relationship we had forged.  It very easily could have ended differently.

In the following weeks and months, that relationship was my sanctuary providing protection from the life I was trying to figure out if I was even interested in living.  He was unwavering in his position that my life was worth saving and steadfast in his commitment to help me but was always, always respectful when I often did not feel the same way.  Slowly, over time, my position changed.  It was not a linear path, I certainly took the long road to get there, and he stood next to me the entire way.

A year ago, I never would have even considered sharing my story but as I read the lived experience stories of others, it became clear that my experience is different in two significant ways.  First, we tried many different types of medication, alone and in combination, but nothing worked.  Despite what is often reflected in these stories, medication does not work for everybody and if it’s not working for you please know that you are not alone.  Recovery is possible without medication and while I wish it had worked, that was not to be part of my story and it may not be part of your story either.  Second, and most importantly, I had a therapist who was an expert in treating suicide.  For me, this was the game-changer.

As I shared, I saw other mental health providers prior to finding the therapist who would ultimately save my life.  While I liked all of them, they were either not trained in how to manage a patient with suicide or were working within a system that was not set-up to manage a patient with suicide.  Treating suicide is not something that most professionals are taught in training programs and many mental health systems still use threats, coercion, and practices like no-suicide contracts, which do more damage than good.

If you work within these systems, I implore you to work to change them and if you are a provider who may not be familiar with evidence-based treatments and brief-interventions for suicide, please explore the resources available to learn more and get the training necessary to implement them adherently. I am not a mental health provider, but I have been told by many that it is incredibly scary to work with people with suicide and I believe this to be true.  But standing up at the top of the hole and looking down is not what a person in the fight for their life needs or, frankly, deserves.

Perspective from a person with lived experience of serious thoughts of suicide.

Zero Suicide – Outcomes and Opportunities

Zero Suicide - Outcomes and Opportunities

The Zero Suicide model was launched in 2012 as part of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. Consistent with the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention, Zero Suicide called for improved suicide identification and care in health care systems and promoted use of evidence-based practices by health care providers. Seven core elements comprise the model: “Lead”, “Train”, and “Improve” are the structural components embedded throughout the system and necessary for change, success, fidelity, and continuous quality improvement. “Identify”, “Engage”, “Treat”, and “Transition” are clinical components of the model and define the care patients should receive. Despite evidence supporting each component, use of the full model within systems of care varies.

Over 38% of individuals have made a healthcare visit (e.g., primary care, emergency department, specialty care, etc.) within the week before their suicide attempt and 95% have had a healthcare visit within the preceding year. While this varies across race and ethnicity, these are clearly missed opportunities to identify and care for people at risk for suicide.

Seeing suicide as a never event forces the organization to use best practices, apply continuous quality improvement, and emphasize reducing errors while holding the system to account, not the individual. The clinical science of treating suicidality has evolved such that we now have several proven suicide-specific treatments with additional promising treatments in development. However, graduate programs, professional certification, and continuing education rarely focus on suicide-specific treatments as a competency for graduation or licensure and clinicians report a lack of comfort, confidence, and skill in delivering suicide care.

The Zero Suicide approach has demonstrated notable reductions in suicide and suicide behaviors as well as improvements to using evidenced-based practices. This webinar will describe the Zero Suicide model, discuss challenges, disparities, and opportunities regarding uptake of the unique components of the model, and share how organizations can get started on their Zero Suicide implementation efforts.

Julie Goldstein Grumet, PhD

Julie Goldstein Grumet, PhD

Julie is Vice President for Suicide Prevention Strategy and the Director of the Zero Suicide Institute at the Education Development Center. She provides strategic direction to health care systems to improve the identification and treatment for people at risk for suicide. She has collaborated on numerous grants and publications about systems-based approaches to suicide prevention. Julie’s primary responsibility is to advance the development, dissemination, and effective implementation of comprehensive suicide care practices in various settings. She has expertise in behavioral health transformation, state and local community suicide prevention, quality improvement, and the use of evidence-based practices for suicide care in clinical settings. Julie has a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from The George Washington University and lives in Silver Spring, MD.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter you information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Improving Outpatient Suicide Treatment, a Better Alternative to EDs and Hospitals

Improving Outpatient Suicide Treatment, a Better Alternative to EDs and Hospitals

In a 2021 proclamation, President Biden stated “My Administration is committed to advancing suicide prevention best practices and improving non-punitive crisis response.” This and other mandates for suicide care have come from the Joint Commission and system change recommendations from national Zero Suicide programs. Because of these efforts there has been substantial expansion of suicide screening and assessment as well as safety planning, but treatment has lagged behind. As a result, patients and families are often referred to the emergency department even when an outpatient intervention is better suited to their immediate needs. This approach results in overwhelmed systems and negative experiences for patients and providers. The new Suicide Care Research Center at the University of Washington is working to improve the design and delivery of suicide specific care in outpatient medical settings, so they are effective, feasible in busy clinic environments and supportive of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients, their providers, and their families. This presentation will highlight the need for a paradigm shift in suicide care, describe our innovative integration of human centered design and optimization in the development of new interventions, and showcase some example interventions and interventions under development.

Kate Comtois, PhD, MPH

Kate Comtois, PhD, MPH

Kate Comtois, PhD, MPH is a professor and clinical psychologist in the University of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and director of the UW Center for Suicide Prevention and Recovery (CSPAR) and the Suicide Care Research Center (SCRC) – an NIMH-funded practice-based research center. Dr. Comtois’ career is dedicated to promoting the recovery of individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behavior and the effectiveness and resilience of the clinical staff and families who care for them. This is the focus of her clinical work and training as well as her health services, treatment development, clinical trials, and implementation research.

Watch the Recorded Webinar On-Demand

Enter your information to gain access.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form